Results

Our own account, with the boring parts left in.

FeeBulldog runs first on our founder's FBA business — 1,200+ ASINs. Below are actual figures from our claim ledgers, plus the prevention work those audits identified. Recovered money and projected savings are kept strictly apart, and we show the claims that lost as well as the ones that won.

Part one — recovery

Money Amazon actually paid back

Every figure here is cash reimbursed and reconciled against the payment ledger. Nothing projected, nothing pending.

Recovered, last 30 days

$2,595

36 separate payments, 25 July – 24 August 2026. Cash reimbursed, reconciled against the payment ledger.

That rate, annualised

~$31,600

The last 30 days extended to twelve months. A projection from our current run-rate — see the monthly figures below, because recovery is lumpy.

Largest single payment

$765

One SKU, wrong dimensions on file, corrected at the source so it stopped recurring.

Median payment

$8.46

The honest shape of this work: a long tail of small corrections, not lottery tickets.

Month by month, so you can do your own arithmetic

Month Reimbursed
April 2026 (from 28th)$145
May 2026$572
June 2026$95
July 2026$414
August 2026 (to 24th)$2,512

August is our strongest month by a distance — the audit tooling matured and a filing backlog cleared. Annualising the full period since April instead gives roughly $11,600/yr. Both numbers are real; they simply answer different questions. Take the lower one if you want the conservative case.

The part nobody publishes

What we filed that did not pay

Over the same period we filed 278 remeasurement tickets. A large share came back confirmed at $0 — Amazon agreed to re-measure, found no qualifying inventory in the window, and paid nothing. Others were rejected outright for having no measurable stock at the fulfillment center.

Separately we filed 31 storage-fee claims. Six were paid, totalling $71.96. Nineteen were denied — several as duplicates of a prior remeasurement case, several on grounds Amazon changed mid-process. Six more are still open. That is a 19% win rate against everything filed, and we are publishing it because you deserve to know what the denominator looks like before anyone quotes you a recovery figure.

Why this matters to you. A service that only shows wins is choosing what you see. The filings that fail are the reason we work the queue by deadline, refuse to file weak claims, and treat prevention as the main event rather than the upsell. What we refuse to file →

Part two — prevention

The money that never gets charged

The same audits that produced those claims also found structural overcharges — fees billed correctly, on packaging that did not need to be that size. These are engineering projects, not claims, and the arithmetic below is a projection from measured data. It is not money in the bank yet.

Projected · one product line

$65,457/yr

Bringing 49 backpack ASINs down to 1.57″ billed thickness: $4,737/mo fulfillment plus $472/mo storage, rising to $1,453/mo storage in Q4. Target in progress.

Proven, not hypothetical

1.57″

Two ASINs in the same line already measure 1.57″ on Amazon's own scales — which is how we know the target is achievable rather than wishful.

Ratio that decided our strategy

5.5×

That one packaging project is worth about five and a half times our recovery run-rate: $65,457/yr against the $11,600/yr the full period since April annualises to. Annual against annual — the honest comparison, and the conservative one. Recovery is the small half.

How we corrected ourselves. Our first pass at this project claimed $88,344/yr. It was wrong — it assumed a thickness no backpack can physically hit, and applied cuts to SKUs already thin. Rebuilt against what the line actually achieves, the number came down to $65,457. We are showing you both figures because a projection you cannot audit is worth nothing.

Three cases worth reading

How the money actually comes back

The fix that only half-fixed itself

We won a fulfillment-fee correction on an item — Amazon agreed its recorded thickness was wrong and repriced the fee. Months later the storage bill for the same item was still computed on the old, wrong dimensions, costing about $26 every month. Different record, different claim, different case. Nobody checks the second record; that is exactly why we do.

The reimbursement that wasn't

Twice, Amazon's reply said a fee reimbursement "has been applied" — and the amount exactly matched a credit already paid weeks earlier. Restated, not new money. If we banked reimbursements off Amazon's emails we would have double-counted hundreds of dollars. Every credit is matched against the payment ledger before it counts.

The case that sat for weeks — until we could prove it

A remeasurement request stalled past Amazon's own ten-business-day standard with nothing but holding replies. We escalated with one decisive piece of evidence: Amazon's own workflow showed zero remeasurements had been performed under the case. Amazon conceded the measurement had never happened and moved. Stalled cases do not get closed — they get escalated with proof.

What we are not showing you

No client logos and no testimonials — FeeBulldog is newly open to outside sellers, and inventing social proof would contradict everything else on this page. Client results will appear here with permission, in this same format, including the ones that disappoint.

What we can show you in the meantime is the deliverable itself. The complete findings report is published here — the real structure, with invented data on a seller who does not exist, because a fake client would be worse than no client.

We are also not claiming your account looks like ours. A 1,200-ASIN toy and apparel catalog has different error rates than forty high-value electronics SKUs. The only number that means anything is the one from your own account, which is what the free audit produces.

Recovery figures are from our founder's Amazon FBA account, under Amazon's current post-2024 rules; the headline figure covers 25 July – 24 August 2026 and the monthly table covers 28 April – 24 August 2026. Recovered amounts are reconciled against the payment ledger. Annualised and projected figures are extrapolations from those periods, labelled where they appear, and are not guarantees — monthly recovery varies widely, which is why the month-by-month figures are published above. Your results depend on your catalog and Amazon's review process.

See both halves on your account.

The free audit gives you the recovery figure and the prevention figure, separately, with the arithmetic shown.